| Title |
2020 Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandeep R. Das, Brendan M. Everett, Kim K. Birtcher, Jenifer M. Brown, James L. Januzzi, Rita R. Kalyani, Mikhail Kosiborod, Melissa Magwire, Pamela B. Morris, Joshua J. Neumiller, Laurence S. Sperling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 278 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 14% |
| Spain | 37 | 13% |
| Mexico | 17 | 6% |
| Colombia | 13 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 11 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 7 | 3% |
| Argentina | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Peru | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 107 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 202 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 15% |
| Scientists | 31 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 77 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 84 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#158,757
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#351
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,053
of 427,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#8
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.