↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Pulmonary Artery Denervation for Patients With Residual Pulmonary Hypertension After Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary Artery Denervation for Patients With Residual Pulmonary Hypertension After Pulmonary Endarterectomy
Published in
JACC, August 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Romanov, Alexander Cherniavskiy, Nataliya Novikova, Alexander Edemskiy, Dmitry Ponomarev, Vitaliy Shabanov, Denis Losik, Dmitry Elesin, Ilya Stenin, Igor Mikheenko, Roman Zhizhov, Evgeny Kretov, Evgeny Pokushalov, Sunny S. Po, Tamila V. Martynyuk, Jonathan S. Steinberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 32 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 31 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#350,019
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#816
of 16,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,857
of 428,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#29
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.