↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Left Ventricular Intramyocardial Dissecting Hematomas

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Case Reports, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 443)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
273 tweeters
Title
Left Ventricular Intramyocardial Dissecting Hematomas
Published in
JACC: Case Reports, October 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.07.038
Authors

Gaurav Agarwal, Vijay Kumar, K.H. Srinivas, Cholenahally N. Manjunath, Bhat Prabhavathi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 273 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#97,768
of 16,072,584 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#4
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,649
of 219,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,072,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.