↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Breaking Bad

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 689)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Breaking Bad
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariq Ahmad, Jacob N. Schroder, James L. Januzzi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 637. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,552
of 11,771,184 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#2
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#477
of 271,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,771,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.