| Title |
Radiation Exposure Among Scrub Technologists and Nurse Circulators During Cardiac Catheterization The Impact of Accessory Lead Shields
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan D. Madder, Andrew LaCombe, Stacie VanOosterhout, Abbey Mulder, Matthew Elmore, Jessica L. Parker, Mark E. Jacoby, David Wohns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 65% |
| Egypt | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#716,677
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#181
of 4,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,902
of 343,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.