↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions

Overview of attention for article published in JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,445)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
182 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions
Published in
JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Tajti, M. Nicholas Burke, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Khaldoon Alaswad, Gerald S. Werner, Lorenzo Azzalini, Mauro Carlino, Mitul Patel, Kambis Mashayekhi, Mohaned Egred, Oleg Krestyaninov, Dmitrii Khelimskii, William J. Nicholson, Imre Ungi, Alfredo R. Galassi, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) has been rapidly evolving during recent years. With improvement in equipment and techniques, high success rates can be achieved at experienced centers, although overall success rates remain low. Prospective, randomized-controlled data regarding optimal use and indications for CTO PCI remain limited. CTO PCI should be performed when the anticipated benefit exceeds the potential risk. New high-quality studies of the clinical outcomes and techniques of CTO PCI are needed, as is the expansion of expert centers and operators that can achieve excellent clinical outcomes in this challenging patient and lesion subgroup. In the current review the authors summarize the latest publications in CTO PCI and provide an overview of the current state of the field.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 46%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 69%
Unspecified 3 23%
Chemistry 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#82,499
of 11,383,805 outputs
Outputs from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#8
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,841
of 251,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC Cardiovascular Interventions
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,383,805 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.