↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for CVD Prevention and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 11,355)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
169 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
961 tweeters
facebook
31 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for CVD Prevention and Treatment
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J.A. Jenkins, J. David Spence, Edward L. Giovannucci, Young-in Kim, Robert Josse, Reinhold Vieth, Sonia Blanco Mejia, Effie Viguiliouk, Stephanie Nishi, Sandhya Sahye-Pudaruth, Melanie Paquette, Darshna Patel, Sandy Mitchell, Meaghan Kavanagh, Tom Tsirakis, Lina Bachiri, Atherai Maran, Narmada Umatheva, Taylor McKay, Gelaine Trinidad, Daniel Bernstein, Awad Chowdhury, Julieta Correa-Betanzo, Gabriella Del Principe, Anisa Hajizadeh, Rohit Jayaraman, Amy Jenkins, Wendy Jenkins, Ruben Kalaichandran, Geithayini Kirupaharan, Preveena Manisekaran, Tina Qutta, Ramsha Shahid, Alexis Silver, Cleo Villegas, Jessica White, Cyril W.C. Kendall, Sathish C. Pichika, John L. Sievenpiper

Abstract

The authors identified individual randomized controlled trials from previous meta-analyses and additional searches, and then performed meta-analyses on cardiovascular disease outcomes and all-cause mortality. The authors assessed publications from 2012, both before and including the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force review. Their systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed generally moderate- or low-quality evidence for preventive benefits (folic acid for total cardiovascular disease, folic acid and B-vitamins for stroke), no effect (multivitamins, vitamins C, D, β-carotene, calcium, and selenium), or increased risk (antioxidant mixtures and niacin [with a statin] for all-cause mortality). Conclusive evidence for the benefit of any supplement across all dietary backgrounds (including deficiency and sufficiency) was not demonstrated; therefore, any benefits seen must be balanced against possible risks.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 961 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 20%
Unspecified 19 15%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Unspecified 27 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 30 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2026. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#669
of 12,829,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#1
of 11,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30
of 272,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#1
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,829,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.