| Title |
Emerging Applications of Virtual Reality in Cardiovascular Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.11.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer N.A. Silva, Michael Southworth, Constantine Raptis, Jonathan Silva |
| Abstract |
Recently, rapid development in the mobile computing arena has allowed extended reality technologies to achieve performance levels that remove longstanding barriers to medical adoption. Importantly, head-mounted displays have become untethered and are light enough to be worn for extended periods of time, see-through displays allow the user to remain in his or her environment while interacting with digital content, and processing power has allowed displays to keep up with human perception to prevent motion sickness. Across cardiology, many groups are taking advantage of these advances for education, pre-procedural planning, intraprocedural visualization, and patient rehabilitation. Here, we detail these applications and the advances that have made them possible. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Jersey | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 24% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 111 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 44 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 13% |
| Engineering | 38 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 127 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#252,885
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#20
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,481
of 342,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.