↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 2,725)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
192 X users
patent
42 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyuk-Jae Chang, Fay Y Lin, Dan Gebow, Hae Young An, Daniele Andreini, Ravi Bathina, Andrea Baggiano, Virginia Beltrama, Rodrigo Cerci, Eui-Young Choi, Jung-Hyun Choi, So-Yeon Choi, Namsik Chung, Jason Cole, Joon-Hyung Doh, Sang-Jin Ha, Ae-Young Her, Cezary Kepka, Jang-Young Kim, Jin-Won Kim, Sang-Wook Kim, Woong Kim, Gianluca Pontone, Uma Valeti, Todd C Villines, Yao Lu, Amit Kumar, Iksung Cho, Ibrahim Danad, Donghee Han, Ran Heo, Sang-Eun Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Hyung-Bok Park, Ji-Min Sung, David Leflang, Joseph Zullo, Leslee J Shaw, James K Min

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 192 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Unspecified 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 56 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 33%
Unspecified 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 63 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#233,877
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#29
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,798
of 447,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.