| Title |
Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.070 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sayan Sen, Yousif Ahmad, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, James P. Howard, Juan F. Iglesias, Rasha Al-Lamee, Ricardo Petraco, Sukhjinder Nijjer, Ravinay Bhindi, Sam Lehman, Darren Walters, James Sapontis, Luc Janssens, Christiaan J. Vrints, Ahmed Khashaba, Mika Laine, Eric Van Belle, Florian Krackhardt, Waldemar Bojara, Olaf Going, Tobias Härle, Ciro Indolfi, Giampaolo Niccoli, Flavio Ribichini, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Hiroaki Takashima, Yuetsu Kikuta, Andrejs Erglis, Hugo Vinhas, Pedro Canas Silva, Sérgio B. Baptista, Ali Alghamdi, Farrel Hellig, Bon-Kwon Koo, Chang-Wook Nam, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Salvatore Brugaletta, Eduardo Alegria-Barrero, Martijin Meuwissen, Jan J. Piek, Niels van Royen, Murat Sezer, Carlo Di Mario, Robert T. Gerber, Iqbal S. Malik, Andrew S.P. Sharp, Suneel Talwar, Kare Tang, Habib Samady, John Altman, Arnold H. Seto, Jasvindar Singh, Allen Jeremias, Hitoshi Matsuo, Rajesh K. Kharbanda, Manesh R. Patel, Patrick Serruys, Javier Escaned, Justin E. Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Egypt | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 48% |
| Scientists | 15 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,131,173
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,759
of 16,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,526
of 449,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#81
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.