| Title |
Disparities in Cardiovascular Mortality Related to Heart Failure in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Glynn, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Matthew J. Feinstein, Mercedes Carnethon, Sadiya S. Khan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 25% |
| Spain | 27 | 21% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 65% |
| Scientists | 26 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 394. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#78,262
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#182
of 17,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,518
of 366,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#8
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.