| Title |
Oral Anticoagulant Type and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Jochheim, Marco Barbanti, Giuliana Capretti, Giulio G Stefanini, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Magda Zadrozny, Moritz Baquet, Julius Fischer, Hans Theiss, Denise Todaro, Alaide Chieffo, Patrizia Presbitero, Antonio Colombo, Steffen Massberg, Corrado Tamburino, Julinda Mehilli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 52 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,792,610
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#1,336
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,100
of 368,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#42
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.