| Title |
Differential Risk of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Male and Female Smokers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.525 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Palmer, Amelia Lloyd, Lloyd Steele, James Fotheringham, Dawn Teare, Javaid Iqbal, Ever D. Grech |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 25% |
| Canada | 7 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 58% |
| Scientists | 15 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#117,315
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#262
of 16,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,180
of 364,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#5
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.