↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Staging Cardiac Damage in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
281 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Staging Cardiac Damage in Patients With Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.048
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Mara Vollema, Mohammed R. Amanullah, Arnold C.T. Ng, Pieter van der Bijl, Francesca Prevedello, Yoong Kong Sin, Edgard A. Prihadi, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Zee Pin Ding, Philippe Généreux, Philippe Pibarot, Martin B. Leon, Jagat Narula, See Hooi Ewe, Victoria Delgado, Jeroen J. Bax

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 281 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#71,936
of 13,516,331 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#210
of 11,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,125
of 230,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#11
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.