↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Learning From a Heart Transplant Patient

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Case Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
472 tweeters
Title
Learning From a Heart Transplant Patient
Published in
JACC: Case Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.06.008
Authors

Alin Gragossian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 472 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 308. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#38,005
of 13,516,331 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#1
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#769
of 170,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one scored the same or higher as 47 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.