↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

2019 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Risk Assessment, Management, and Clinical Trajectory of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
350 tweeters
Title
2019 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Risk Assessment, Management, and Clinical Trajectory of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven M. Hollenberg, Lynne Warner Stevenson, Tariq Ahmad, Vaibhav J. Amin, Biykem Bozkurt, Javed Butler, Leslie L. Davis, Mark H. Drazner, James N. Kirkpatrick, Pamela N. Peterson, Brent N. Reed, Christopher L. Roy, Alan B. Storrow

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 350 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#53,221
of 13,638,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#154
of 11,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,473
of 221,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#6
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,638,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.