↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Article Metrics

Differences in Transient Thermal Response of Commercial Esophageal Temperature Probes

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Differences in Transient Thermal Response of Commercial Esophageal Temperature Probes
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohit K. Turagam, Steve Miller, Sharan Prakash Sharma, Punit Prakash, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Prajwala Lakkireddy, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Jie Cheng, Andrea Natale, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#912,898
of 14,091,558 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#170
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,600
of 262,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,091,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.