Title |
Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Using a Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker Results From the MARVEL 2 Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clemens Steinwender, Surinder Kaur Khelae, Christophe Garweg, Joseph Yat Sun Chan, Philippe Ritter, Jens Brock Johansen, Venkata Sagi, Laurence M Epstein, Jonathan P Piccini, Mario Pascual, Lluis Mont, Todd Sheldon, Vincent Splett, Kurt Stromberg, Nicole Wood, Larry Chinitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 29 | 41% |
Japan | 5 | 7% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
India | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 2 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 47 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 18% |
Scientists | 9 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 18 | 15% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 41% |
Engineering | 7 | 6% |
Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 54 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#103,470
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#10
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,021
of 375,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.