| Title |
COVID-19 and Disruptive Modifications to Cardiac Critical Care Delivery JACC Review Topic of the Week
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason N. Katz, Shashank S. Sinha, Carlos L. Alviar, David M. Dudzinski, Ann Gage, Samuel B. Brusca, M. Casey Flanagan, Timothy Welch, Bram J. Geller, P. Elliott Miller, Sergio Leonardi, Erin A. Bohula, Susanna Price, Sunit-Preet Chaudhry, Thomas S. Metkus, Connor G. O’Brien, Alessandro Sionis, Christopher F. Barnett, Jacob C. Jentzer, Michael A. Solomon, David A. Morrow, Sean van Diepen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 36% |
| Spain | 8 | 6% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 15% |
| Scientists | 13 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 93 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 102 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#457,729
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,120
of 16,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,694
of 388,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#21
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.