| Title |
COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-Up JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Behnood Bikdeli, Mahesh V. Madhavan, David Jimenez, Taylor Chuich, Isaac Dreyfus, Elissa Driggin, Caroline Der Nigoghossian, Walter Ageno, Mohammad Madjid, Yutao Guo, Liang V. Tang, Yu Hu, Jay Giri, Mary Cushman, Isabelle Quéré, Evangelos P. Dimakakos, C. Michael Gibson, Giuseppe Lippi, Emmanuel J. Favaloro, Jawed Fareed, Joseph A. Caprini, Alfonso J. Tafur, John R. Burton, Dominic P. Francese, Elizabeth Y. Wang, Anna Falanga, Claire McLintock, Beverley J. Hunt, Alex C. Spyropoulos, Geoffrey D. Barnes, John W. Eikelboom, Ido Weinberg, Sam Schulman, Marc Carrier, Gregory Piazza, Joshua A. Beckman, P. Gabriel Steg, Gregg W. Stone, Stephan Rosenkranz, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Sahil A. Parikh, Manuel Monreal, Harlan M. Krumholz, Stavros V. Konstantinides, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Endorsed by the ISTH Global COVID-19 Thrombosis Collaborative Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 165 | 15% |
| Spain | 99 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 64 | 6% |
| Mexico | 46 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 34 | 3% |
| Colombia | 27 | 2% |
| Canada | 23 | 2% |
| France | 23 | 2% |
| Italy | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 198 | 18% |
| Unknown | 418 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 794 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 183 | 16% |
| Scientists | 107 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 33 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,641 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2641 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 283 | 11% |
| Researcher | 282 | 11% |
| Other | 226 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 195 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 182 | 7% |
| Other | 557 | 21% |
| Unknown | 916 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 935 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 122 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 90 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 87 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 2% |
| Other | 337 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1012 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#10,305
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#25
of 16,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#584
of 404,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#3
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.