| Title |
Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uri Landes, John G. Webb, Ole De Backer, Lars Sondergaard, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Lisa Crusius, Won-Keun Kim, Christian Hamm, Nicola Buzzatti, Matteo Montorfano, Sebastian Ludwig, Niklas Schofer, Lisa Voigtlaender, Mayra Guerrero, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Leonardo Guimaraes, Ran Kornowski, Pablo Codner, Taishi Okuno, Thomas Pilgrim, Claudia Fiorina, Antonio Colombo, Antonio Mangieri, Helene Eltchaninoff, Luis Nombela-Franco, Maarten P.H. Van Wiechen, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Didier Tchétché, Wolfgang H. Schoels, Matthias Kullmer, Corrado Tamburino, Jan-Malte Sinning, Baravan Al-Kassou, Gidon Y. Perlman, Haim Danenberg, Alfonso Ielasi, Chiara Fraccaro, Giuseppe Tarantini, Federico De Marco, Guy Witberg, Simon R. Redwood, John C. Lisko, Vasilis C. Babaliaros, Mika Laine, Roberto Nerla, Fausto Castriota, Ariel Finkelstein, Itamar Loewenstein, Amnon Eitan, Ronen Jaffe, Philipp Ruile, Franz J. Neumann, Nicolo Piazza, Hind Alosaimi, Horst Sievert, Kolja Sievert, Marco Russo, Martin Andreas, Matjaz Bunc, Azeem Latib, Rebecca Govdfrey, David Hildick-Smith, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Mark Hensey, Abdullah Alkhodair, Philipp Blanke, Jonathon Leipsic, David A. Wood, Tamim M. Nazif, Susheel Kodali, Martin B. Leon, Marco Barbanti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 26% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 8 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 42% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#826,273
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,064
of 16,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,783
of 399,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#56
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.