| Title |
Autonomic Modulation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Methods to Assess Treatment and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stavros Stavrakis, Kanchan Kulkarni, Jagmeet P. Singh, Demosthenes G. Katritsis, Antonis A. Armoundas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| India | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 64% |
| Scientists | 17 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#760,137
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#110
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,019
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.